Alternative Healing news

Pancreatic cancer has come to the forefront of public awareness recently with news of several famous celebrities that have been diagnosed with this difficult to treat form of cancer. Luciano Pavarotti lost his life to pancreatic cancer in September, 2007. Patrick Swayze is fighting for his life, against this disease, as I write. Steve Jobs’ previous bout of pancreatic cancer has caused financial analysts to speculate whether his dramatic weight loss is due to the cancer’s return.

Perhaps the most touching case of pancreatic cancer that has come to worldwide public attention in the last few years, is the case of 47 year old Professor Randy Pausch, of Carnegie Mellon University. The Internet video of his upbeat “last lecture,” presented on September 18, 2007, catapulted him to world-wide fame and inspired millions of viewers. Sadly, less than a year later, he died of complications from pancreatic cancer.

The American Cancer Society estimates that 37,680 Americans get pancreatic cancer each year. The five-year survival rate in the US is only 5%. Given the bleak prospects offered by conventional medicine, it’s easy to understand why there is keen interest in pancreatic cancer alternative cures.

Alternative treatments and cures for all forms of cancer, however, is one of the most controversial topics in all of medicine, and has been for almost a century. There are very good reasons for this controversy. Thousands of lives and billions of dollars are at stake.

These high stakes tend to polarize viewpoints into two conflicting camps. In one camp, mainstream medical organizations claim that a general “cure for cancer” has not yet been found. Thus, according to these authorities, those who claim that cancer can be cured are unscrupulous “quacks” who must be exposed to protect a vulnerable, and desperate, population from being taken advantage of, and succumbing to “false hope.”

Alternative proponents, on the other hand, point out the conflict of interest inherent in research agencies and support foundations that would cause their own demise by succeeding in their stated goal of finding “a cure for cancer.” They further point out that, in “protecting a gullible public,” they are also protecting the enormous profits of the billion dollar cancer treatment industry, which thrives on the continuation of the illness.

As in discussions of religion and politics, rational considerations of evidence usually turn quickly into emotional defenses of previously held positions. Thus the purpose of my article is not to convince supporters of mainstream medicine that alternative cures for cancer already do exist. My purpose is to share with those who are curious and open minded, one of the most promising therapies among alternative cancer cures, which applies particularly well to pancreatic cancer because it is a systemic treatment.

In 1931, Dr. Otto Warburg won the Nobel Prize in Physiology for research that has since lead to a very effective alternative cancer treatment . What was his breakthrough discovery? He proved that viruses can not proliferate, or even survive, in an environment that has high levels of oxygen. Dr. Warburg is quoted as saying, “Deprive a cell of 35% of its oxygen for 48 hours and it may become cancerous.” According to researcher Madison Cavanaugh, Dr. Warburg “further stated that the prime cause of cancer is insufficient oxygen at the cellular level, and that cancer cells cannot survive in a high oxygen environment.”

Of course this raises an obvious question, “Will increasing the oxygen in the body of a cancer patient eradicate the cancer?” In fact, this is the million-dollar question, literally. It is a simple question, and you would expect that in the 80 years since publication of Dr. Warburg’s research, there would have been substantial research to answer it. In fact, there has been substantial research into what are called bio-oxidative therapies for curing cancer, with truly amazing results. Almost all of this research has been carried out by European doctors and scientists.

Why have you not heard of this research? The simple answer is because these procedures cannot be patented. Some forms can even be self-administered easily, at home, in several minutes. Consequently, there is no financial incentive for any company to do the strict, double blind, clinical trials, which is the only “proof” that is acceptable to the medical profession, nor to invest in marketing these treatments.

Nerve Injuries & Nerve damage Treatment: Energy Healing for Restoring Nerve Disease, Nerve Disorders & Peripheral Neuropathy

Whether you have a pinched or severed nerve, sciatica, peripheral neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy symptoms, stroke or brain damage, a nerve injury creating paralysis, or any loss of physical sensation or movement, nerve damage is an annoying and dehabilitating chronic condition that can benefit from energy healing.

Dr Robert Becker in his book “the Body Electric” was a pioneer in discovering that electromagnet impulses could regenerate neural pathways and restore nerve function. Directed electromagnetic impulses can re establish muscular movement through electrical current stimulation. According to CBC News, “The functional electrical stimulation rowing machine, developed by researchers in Edmonton and England, helps people with disabilities (paraplegics and others) enjoy the benefits of regular exercise.” Christopher Reeves used electrical muscle stimulation on his legs to prevent atrophy and within his diaphragm to encourage breathing movement and maintain lung function. Even the acute pain exacerbated by nerve injury is relieved with focused electrical impulses. TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation) machines deliver small electrical pulses to the body via electrodes and has widespread clinical use for pain relief from nerve damage.

Energy Healing is a form of electromagnetic stimulation. According to James L Oschman, “Healing energy, whether produced by a medical device or projected from the human body, is energy of a particular frequency or set of frequencies that stimulates the repair of one or more tissues.” Energy healing directed by a healer focuses electromagnetic energy stimulation into the energy field and physical body of the client. This transfer of directed electromagnetic frequency stimulation affects the clients cellular molecular system and the “cascade of activities initiated by such signals may provide essential information to cells and tissues, and open channels for the flow of information that coordinates repair processes and for restoring normal function after trauma.” Energy Healing is non-invasive and there are no clinically documented adverse events in existing literature.